Newsletters

The IRS has announced a second Voluntary Disclosure Program for employers to resolve erroneous claims for credit or refund involving the COVID-19 Employee Retention Credit (ERC). Participation in the second ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program is limited to ERC claims filed for the 2021 tax period(s), and cannot be used to disclose and repay ERC money from tax periods in 2020.

The IRS has announced a second Voluntary Disclosure Program for employers to resolve erroneous claims for credit or refund involving the COVID-19 Employee Retention Credit (ERC). Participation in the second ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program is limited to ERC claims filed for the 2021 tax period(s), and cannot be used to disclose and repay ERC money from tax periods in 2020.

The program is designed to help businesses with questionable claims to self-correct and repay the credits they received after filing erroneous ERC claims, many of which were driven by aggressive marketing from unscrupulous promoters.

The first ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program was announced in late December 2023, and ended on March 22, 2024 (Announcement 2024-3, I.R.B. 2024-2, 364). Over 2,600 taxpayers applied to the first program to resolve their improper ERC claims and avoid civil penalties and unnecessary litigation.

The second ERC Voluntary Disclosure Program will allow businesses to correct improper payments at a 15-percent discount, and avoid future audits, penalties and interest.

Procedures for Second Voluntary Disclosure Program

To apply, employers must file Form 15434, Application for Employee Retention Credit Voluntary Disclosure Program, and submit it through the IRS Document Upload Tool. Employers must provide the IRS with the names, addresses, telephone numbers and details about the services provided by any advisors or tax preparers who advised or assisted them with their claims, and are expected to repay their full ERC claimed, minus the 15-percent reduction allowed through the Voluntary Disclosure Program.

Eligible employers must apply by 11:59 pm local time on November 22, 2024.

The Department of the Treasury and the IRS released statistics on the Inflation Reduction Act clean energy tax credits for the 2023 tax year. Taxpayers have claimed over $6 billion in tax credits for residential clean energy investments and more than $2 billion for energy-efficient home improvements on 2023 tax returns filed and processed through May 23, 2024.

The Department of the Treasury and the IRS released statistics on the Inflation Reduction Act clean energy tax credits for the 2023 tax year. Taxpayers have claimed over $6 billion in tax credits for residential clean energy investments and more than $2 billion for energy-efficient home improvements on 2023 tax returns filed and processed through May 23, 2024.

For the Residential Clean Energy Credit, 1,246,440 returns were filed, with a total credit value of $6.3 billion and an average of $5,084 per return. Specific investments include:

• Rooftop solar: 752,300 returns, up to 30 percent of the cost;
• Batteries: 48,840 returns, up to 30 percent of the cost.

For the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit, 2,338,430 returns were filed, with a total credit value of $2.1 billion and an average of $882 per return. Specific improvements include:

• Home insulation: 669,440 returns, up to 30 percent of the cost;
• Windows and skylights: 694,450 returns, up to 30 percent of the cost or $600;
• Central air conditioners: 488,050 returns, up to 30 percent of the cost or $600;
• Doors: 400,070 returns, up to 30 percent of the cost, $250 per door or $500 total;
• Heat pumps: 267,780 returns, up to 30 percent of the cost or $2,000;
• Heat pump water heaters: 104,180 returns, up to 30 percent of the cost or $2,000.

Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Daniel Werfel is calling on Congress to maintain the agency’s funding and not make any further cuts to the supplemental funding provided to the agency in the Inflation Reduction Act, using recent successes in customer service and compliance to validate his request.

Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Daniel Werfel is calling on Congress to maintain the agency’s funding and not make any further cuts to the supplemental funding provided to the agency in the Inflation Reduction Act, using recent successes in customer service and compliance to validate his request.

"The Inflation Reduction Act funding is making a difference for taxpayers, and we will build on these improvements in the months ahead," Werfel said during a July 24, 2024, press teleconference, adding that "for this progress to continue, we must maintain a reliable, consistent annual appropriations for the agency as well as keeping the Inflation Reduction Act funding intact."

During the call, Werfel highlighted a number of improvements to IRS operations that have come about due to the IRA funding, including expansion of online account features (such as providing more digital forms, making it easier to make online payments, and making access in general easier); providing more access to taxpayers wanting face-to-face assistance (including a 37 percent increase in interactions at taxpayer assistance centers); IT modernization; and the collection of more than $1 billion in taxes due form high wealth individuals.

Werfel did highlight an area where he would like to see some improvements, including the number of taxpayers who have activated their online account.

While he did not have a number of how many taxpayers have activated their accounts so far, he said that “"we are nowhere near where we have the opportunity to be,"” adding that as functionality improves and expands, that will bring more taxpayers in to use their online accounts and other digital services.

He also noted that online accounts will be a deterrent for scams, and it will provide taxpayers with the information they need to not be fooled by scammers.

“We see the online account as a real way to test these scams and schemes because taxpayers will have a single source of truth about whether they actually owe a debt, whether the IRS is trying to reach them, and also information we can push out to taxpayers more regularly if they sign up and opt in for it on the latest scams and schemes,” Werfel said.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The IRS has intensified its efforts to scrutinize claims for the Employee Retention Credit (ERC), issuing five new warning signs of incorrect claims. These warning signs, based on common issues observed by IRS compliance teams, are in addition to seven problem areas previously highlighted by the agency. Businesses with pending or previously approved claims are urged to carefully review their filings to confirm eligibility and ensure credits claimed do not include any of these twelve warning signs or other mistakes. The IRS emphasizes the importance of consulting a trusted tax professional rather than promoters to ensure compliance with ERC rules.

The IRS has intensified its efforts to scrutinize claims for the Employee Retention Credit (ERC), issuing five new warning signs of incorrect claims. These warning signs, based on common issues observed by IRS compliance teams, are in addition to seven problem areas previously highlighted by the agency. Businesses with pending or previously approved claims are urged to carefully review their filings to confirm eligibility and ensure credits claimed do not include any of these twelve warning signs or other mistakes. The IRS emphasizes the importance of consulting a trusted tax professional rather than promoters to ensure compliance with ERC rules.

The newly identified issues include essential businesses claiming ERC despite being fully operational, unsupported government order suspensions, misreporting wages paid to family members, using wages already forgiven under the Paycheck Protection Program, and large employers incorrectly claiming wages for employees who provided services. The IRS plans to deny tens of thousands of claims that show clear signs of being erroneous and scrutinize hundreds of thousands more that may be incorrect. In addition, the IRS announced upcoming compliance measures and details about reopening the Voluntary Disclosure Program, aimed at addressing high-risk ERC claims and processing low-risk payments to help small businesses with legitimate claims.

IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel emphasized the agency’s commitment to pursuing improper claims and increasing payments to businesses with legitimate claims. Promoters lured many businesses into mistakenly claiming the ERC, leading to the IRS digitizing and analyzing approximately 1 million ERC claims, representing over $86 billion. The IRS urges businesses to act promptly to resolve incorrect claims, avoiding future issues such as audits, repayment, penalties, and interest. Taxpayers should recheck their claims with the help of trusted tax professionals, considering options such as the ERC Withdrawal Program or amending their returns to correct overclaimed amounts.

The IRS, in collaboration with state tax agencies and the national tax industry, has initiated a new effort to tackle the rising threat of tax-related scams. This initiative, named the Coalition Against Scam and Scheme Threats (CASST), was launched in response to a significant increase in fraudulent activities during the most recent tax filing season. These scams have targeted both individual taxpayers and government systems, seeking to exploit vulnerabilities for financial gain.

The IRS, in collaboration with state tax agencies and the national tax industry, has initiated a new effort to tackle the rising threat of tax-related scams. This initiative, named the Coalition Against Scam and Scheme Threats (CASST), was launched in response to a significant increase in fraudulent activities during the most recent tax filing season. These scams have targeted both individual taxpayers and government systems, seeking to exploit vulnerabilities for financial gain.

CASST will focus on three primary objectives: enhancing public outreach and education to alert taxpayers to emerging threats, developing new methods to identify fraudulent returns at the point of filing, and improving the infrastructure to protect taxpayers and the integrity of the tax system. This initiative builds on the successful framework of the Security Summit, which was launched in 2015 to combat tax-related identity theft. While the Security Summit made significant progress in reducing identity theft, CASST aims to address a broader range of scams, reflecting the evolving tactics of fraudsters.

The coalition has received widespread support, with over 60 private sector groups, including leading software and financial companies, joining the effort. Key national tax professional organizations are also participating, all committed to strengthening the security of the tax system.

Among the measures CASST will implement are enhanced validation processes for tax preparers, including improvements to the Electronic Filing Identification Number (EFIN) and Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN) systems. The coalition will also target the issue of ghost preparers, who prepare tax returns for a fee without proper disclosure, leading to inflated refunds and significant revenue losses.

In addition to these technical improvements, CASST will address specific scams, such as fraudulent claims for tax credits like the Fuel Tax Credit. By the 2025 filing season, CASST aims to have new protections in place, bolstering defenses across both public and private sectors to make it more difficult for scammers to exploit the tax system. This coordinated effort seeks to protect taxpayers and ensure the integrity of the nation’s tax system.

The Internal Revenue Service will be processing about 50,000 "low-risk" Employee Retention Credit claims, and it will be shifting the moratorium dates on processing.

The Internal Revenue Service will be processing about 50,000 "low-risk"Employee Retention Credit claims, and it will be shifting the moratorium dates on processing.

"The IRS projects payments will begin in September with additional payments going out in subsequent weeks," the agency said in an August 8, 2024, statement."The IRS anticipates adding another large block of additional low-risk claims for processing and payment in the fall."

The agency also announced that it is shifting the moratorium period on processing new claims. Originally, the agency was not processing claims that were filed after September 14, 2023. It is now going to process claims filed between September 14, 2023, and January 31, 2024.

"Like the rest of the ERC inventory, work will focus on the highest and lowest risk claims at the top and bottom end of the spectrum," the IRS said. "This means there will be instances where the agency will start taking actions on claims submitted in this time period when the agency has seen a sound basis to pay or deny any refund claim."

The agency also said it has sent out "28,000 disallowance letters to businesses whose claims showed a high risk of being incorrect," preventing up to $5 billion in improper payments. It also has "thousands of audits underway, and 460 criminal cases have been initiated" with potentially fraudulent claims worth nearly $7 billion. Thirty-seven investigations have resulted in federal charges, with 17 resulting in convictions.

Businesses that receive a denial letter will have the ability to appeal the decision.

The agency also offered some other updates on the ERC program, including:

• The claim withdrawal process for unprocessed ERC has led to more than 7,300 withdrawing $677 million in claims;
• The voluntary disclosure program received more than 2,600 applications from ERC recipients that disclosed $1.09 billion in credits; and
• The IRS Office of Promoter Investigations has received "hundreds" of referrals about suspected abusive tax promoters and preparers improperly promoting the ability to claim the ERC.

"The IRS is committed to continuing out work to resolve this program as Congress contemplates further action, both for the good of legitimate businesses and tax administration," IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel said in the statement.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The IRS has announced substantial progress in its ongoing efforts to modernize tax administration, emphasizing a shift towards digital interactions and enhanced measures to combat tax evasion. This update, part of a broader 10-year plan supported by the Inflation Reduction Act, reflects the agency's commitment to improving taxpayer services and ensuring fairer compliance.

The IRS has announced substantial progress in its ongoing efforts to modernize tax administration, emphasizing a shift towards digital interactions and enhanced measures to combat tax evasion. This update, part of a broader 10-year plan supported by the Inflation Reduction Act, reflects the agency's commitment to improving taxpayer services and ensuring fairer compliance.

The IRS’s push for digital transformation has seen significant advancements, allowing taxpayers to conduct nearly all interactions with the agency online. This initiative aims to reduce the reliance on paper submissions, expedite tax processing, and improve overall efficiency. In 2024 alone, the IRS introduced extended hours at Taxpayer Assistance Centers across the country, particularly benefiting rural and underserved communities. The agency also reported a notable increase in face-to-face interactions, with a 37 percent rise in contacts during the 2024 filing season.

In parallel with these service improvements, the IRS has ramped up efforts to disrupt complex tax evasion schemes. Leveraging advanced data science and technology, the agency has focused on high-income individuals and entities employing sophisticated financial maneuvers to avoid taxes. Among the IRS’s new measures is a moratorium on processing Employee Retention Credit claims to prevent fraud, alongside initiatives targeting abusive use of partnerships and improper corporate practices.

The IRS also highlighted its progress in eliminating paper filings through the introduction of the Document Upload Tool, which allows taxpayers to submit documents electronically. This tool, along with upgraded scanning and mail-sorting equipment, is expected to significantly reduce the volume of paper correspondence, potentially replacing millions of paper documents each year. These technological upgrades are part of the IRS’s broader goal to create a fully digital workflow, thereby speeding up refunds and improving service accuracy.

Additionally, the IRS has launched new programs to ensure taxpayers are informed about and can claim eligible credits and deductions. This includes outreach efforts related to the Child Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit, aiming to bridge the gap for eligible taxpayers who may not have claimed these benefits. These initiatives underline the IRS's dedication to a more equitable tax system, ensuring that all taxpayers have access to the credits and services they are entitled to while maintaining robust compliance standards.

Q:  One of my children received a full scholarship for all expenses to attend college this year.  I had heard that this amount may not be required to be reported on his tax return if certain conditions were met and the funds were used specifically for certain types of her expenses.  Is this true and what amounts spent on my child's education will be treated as qualified expenses?

Q: One of my children received a full scholarship for all expenses to attend college this year. I had heard that this amount may not be required to be reported on his tax return if certain conditions were met and the funds were used specifically for certain types of her expenses. Is this true and what amounts spent on my child's education will be treated as qualified expenses?

A: Any amount received as a "qualified scholarship" or fellowship is not required to be reported as income if your child is a candidate for a degree at an educational institution. For the college that your child attends to be treated as an educational organization, it must (1) be an institution that has as its primary function the presentation of formal instruction, (2) normally maintain a regular faculty and curriculum, and (3) have a regularly enrolled body of students in attendance at the place where the educational activities are regularly carried on. Your child has received a qualified scholarship if he or she can establish, that in accordance with the conditions of the scholarship, the funds received were used for qualified tuition and related expenses.

Qualified tuition and related expenses include tuition and fees required for enrollment or attendance at the educational institution, as well as any fees, books, supplies, and equipment required for courses of instruction at the educational institution. To be treated as related expenses, the fees, books supplies, and equipment must be required of all students in the particular course of instruction. Incidental expenses, such as expenses for room and board, travel, research, equipment, and other expenses that are not required for either enrollment or attendance at the educational institution are not treated as related expenses. Any amounts that are used for room, board and other incidental expenses are not excluded from income.

Example: Assume this year your son received a scholarship in the amount of $20,000 to pay for expenses at a qualified educational institution. His expenses included $12,000 for tuition; $1,100 for books; $900 for lab supplies and fees; and $6,000 for food, housing, clothing, laundry, and other living expenses.

The $14,000 that your son paid for tuition, books and lab supplies and fees are considered to be qualified educational expenses and therefore would not have to be reported as income. The $6,000 that he spent on housing and the other living expenses is considered to be incidental expenses and would have to be reported in his income.

Note: This tax exclusion for qualified scholarships should not be confused with the Hope Scholarship Tax Credit, which has been temporarily renamed the American Opportunity Tax Credit and enhanced for 2009 and 2010 by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The American Opportunity Tax Credit can reach as high as $2,500 for 2009 and 2010 for tuition expenses paid by you for yourself, a spouse or a dependent. Scholarship money that is excluded from income cannot be used in computing your costs for the American Opportunity Tax Credit (i.e. Hope Scholarship Tax Credit). "Financial aid" in the form of student loans, however, is not counted as a scholarship and any money applied to pay tuition can qualify for the Hope Scholarship Tax Credit.

There can be all sorts of complicating factors in assessing whether a particular scholarship will be taxed, such as the treatment of work-study scholarships, educational sabbaticals, scholarships paid by an employer, and stipends to cover the tax on the non-tuition portion of attending a university. If you need additional assistance in determining the taxability of scholarships funds, please contact the office.

Q:The holidays are approaching and I would like to consider giving gifts of appreciation to my employees. What kinds of gifts can I give my employees that they would not have to declare as income on their tax returns? I also would like to make sure my company would be able to deduct the costs of these gifts.

A:First of all, anything given in the business setting is presumed, until proven otherwise, not to be a gift (e.g., is taxable income) -- that is, you are either rewarding an employee for work done or providing an incentive in which he or she will be inclined to do more work in the future. However, the Tax Code and related IRS regulations still allow many gifts to remain tax-free to the employee while being tax deductible to the business. Here is a short list of the rules:

$25 gift rule

A business may deduct up to $25 in gifts given to each recipient during any given year. However, you can't get around this limit by giving to each family member of the intended recipient: they all share in one $25 limit. Items clearly of an advertising nature such as promotional items do not count as long as the item costs $4 or less.

No dollar limit exists on a deduction if the gift is given to a corporation or a partnership. The cost of gifts such as baseball tickets that will be used by an unidentified group of employees also qualifies for the unlimited deduction. However, once again, if the gift is intended eventually to go to a particular individual shareholder or partner, the deduction is limited to $25.

Separate "de minimis" rules

A "de minimis" fringe benefit from employer to employee is considered to be made tax-free to the employee. "De minimis" fringe benefits are not restricted by the $25 per recipient limit otherwise applicable outside of the employer-employee context. However, de minimis fringe benefits must be small "within reason." Typical de minimis gifts include holiday gifts such as a turkey or ham, the occasional company picnic, occasional use of the photocopy machine, occasional supper money, or flowers sent to a sick employee.

The general guidelines for de minimis fringe benefits are:

• the value of the gift must be nominal,
• accounting for all such gifts would be administratively nitpicking,
• the gifts are only occasional, and
• they are given "to promote health, good will, contentment, or efficiency" of employees.

Unfortunately, "gifts of nominal value" exclude such perks as use of a company lodge, season theater tickets, or country club dues. These cannot be given tax-free to an employee. But they do include occasional theater or sports tickets or group meals.

What's more, fringe benefits such as the use of an on-premise athletic facility or subsidized cafeteria are specifically included under IRS rules as de minimis fringe benefits. The traditional gold retirement watch -- or similar gift-- to commemorate a long period of employment is also treated as de minimis. However, cash or items readily convertible into cash, such as gift certificates, are taxable, no matter what the amount.

Dual-income families are commonplace these days, however, some couples are discovering that their second income may not be worth the added aggravation and effort. After taking into consideration daycare expenses, commuting expenses, the countless take-out meals, and additional clothing costs, many are surprised at how much (or how little) of that second income is actually hitting their bank account.

Dual-income families are commonplace these days, however, some couples are discovering that their second income may not be worth the added aggravation and effort. After taking into consideration daycare expenses, commuting expenses, the countless take-out meals, and additional clothing costs, many are surprised at how much (or how little) of that second income is actually hitting their bank account.

Before you and your spouse head off for yet another hectic workweek, it may be worth your time to take a few moments to do a few simple calculations. After assessing what expenditures are necessary in order for both parents to work outside of the home, many couples quickly realize that their second income is essentially paying for the second person to be working.

Crunch the numbers. To determine whether your second income is worth the energy, you will need to calculate the estimated value of the second income. First determine how much the second income brings in after taxes. Then subtract expenses incurred due to the second person working, such as dry cleaning expenses, childcare bills, transportation costs, housecleaning services, landscaping services, and outside dining expenses. The result will be the estimated value of the second person working.

Consider the long-term. Even if your result turns out to be small, you may find that having the second person working will be beneficial to the household in the long run. However, don't forget to consider that, by losing the second income, you may also be losing future retirement benefits and social security earnings.

Take a "dry run". Before reducing down to one income, try living on the person's income you intend to keep for six months, stashing the other income into an emergency savings account. If you are able to do this, chances are you will be able to endure for the long haul.

Many different factors can affect a family's decision to have both parents work - including the fulfillment each parent may get from working regardless of whether their income is adding significantly to the household. However, if trying to make ends meet is the major reason, it may pay off to spend some time analyzing the real net benefit from that second income. If you need any assistance while determining if both spouses should work or not, please feel free to contact the office.

Employers are required by the Internal Revenue Code to calculate, withhold, and deposit with the IRS all federal employment taxes related to wages paid to employees. Failure to comply with these requirements can find certain "responsible persons" held personally liable. Who is a responsible person for purposes of employment tax obligations? The broad interpretation defined by the courts and the IRS may surprise you.

Employers are required by the Internal Revenue Code to calculate, withhold, and deposit with the IRS all federal employment taxes related to wages paid to employees. Failure to comply with these requirements can find certain "responsible persons" held personally liable. Who is a responsible person for purposes of employment tax obligations? The broad interpretation defined by the courts and the IRS may surprise you.

Employer's responsibility regarding employment taxes

Employment taxes such as federal income tax, social security (FICA) tax, unemployment (FUTA) tax and various state taxes (note that state issues are not addressed in this article) are all required to be withheld from an employee's wages. Wages are defined in the Code and the accompanying IRS regulations as all remuneration for services performed by an employee for an employer, including the value of remuneration, such as benefits, paid in any form other than cash. The employer is responsible for depositing withheld taxes (along with related employer taxes) with the IRS in a timely manner.

100% penalty for non-compliance

Although the employer entity is required by law to withhold and pay over employment taxes, the penalty provisions of the Code are enforceable against any responsible person who willfully fails to withhold, account for, or pay over withholding tax to the government. The trust fund recovery penalty -- equal to 100% of the tax not withheld and/or paid over -- is a collection device that is normally assessed only if the tax can't be collected from the employer entity itself. Once assessed, however, this steep penalty becomes a personal liability of the responsible person(s) that can wreak havoc on their personal financial situation -- even personal bankruptcy is not an "out" as this penalty is not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

A corporation, partnership, limited liability or other form of doing business won't insulate a "responsible person" from this obligation. But who is a responsible person for purposes of withholding and paying over employment taxes, and ultimately the possible resulting penalty for noncompliance? Also, what constitutes "willful failure to pay and/or withhold"? To give you a better understanding of your potential liability as an employer or employee, these questions are addressed below.

Who are "responsible persons"?

Typically, the types of individuals who are deemed "responsible persons" for purposes of the employment tax withholding and payment are corporate officers or employees whose job description includes managing and paying employment taxes on behalf of the employer entity.

However, the type of responsibility targeted by the Code and regulations includes familiarity with and/or control over functions that are involved in the collection and deposit of employment taxes. Unfortunately for potential targets, Internal Revenue Code Section 6672 doesn't define the term, and the courts and the IRS have not formulated a specific rule that can be applied to determine who is or is not a "responsible person." Recent cases have found the courts ruling both ways, with the IRS generally applying a broad, comprehensive standard.

A Texas district court, for example, looked at the duties performed by an executive -- and rejected her argument that responsibility should only be assigned to the person with the greatest control over the taxes. Responsibility was not limited to the person with the most authority -- it could be assigned to any number of people so long as they all had sufficient knowledge and capability.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has delineated six nonexclusive factors to determine responsibility for purposes of the penalty: whether the person: (1) is an officer or member of the board of directors; (2) owns a substantial amount of stock in the company; (3) manages the day-to-day operations of the business; (4) has the authority to hire or fire employees; (5) makes decisions as to the disbursement of funds and payment of creditors; and (6) possesses the authority to sign company checks. No one factor is dispositive, according to the court, but it is clear that the court looks to the individual's authority; what he or she could do, not what he or she actually did -- or knew.

The Ninth Circuit recently cited similar factors, holding that whether an individual had knowledge that the taxes were unpaid was irrelevant; instead, said the court, responsibility is a matter of status, duty, and authority, not knowledge. Agreeing with the Texas district court, above, the court held that the penalty provision of Code section 6672 doesn't confine liability for unpaid taxes to the single officer with the greatest control or authority over corporate affairs.

Suffice it to say that, under the various courts' interpretations -- or that of the IRS -- many corporate managers and officers who are neither assigned nor assume any actual responsibility for the regular withholding, collection or deposit of federal employment taxes would be surprised to find that they could be responsible for taxes that should have been paid over by the employer entity but weren't.

What constitutes "willful failure" to comply?

Once it has been established that an individual qualifies as a responsible person, he must also be found to have acted willfully in failing to withhold and pay the taxes. Although it may be easier to establish the ingredients for "responsibility," some courts have focused on the requirement that the individual's failure be willful, relying on various means to divine his or her intent.

An Arizona district court, for example, found that a retired company owner who had turned over the operation of his business to his children while maintaining only consultant status was indeed a responsible person -- but concluded that his past actions indicated that he did not willfully cause the nonpayment of the company's employment taxes. Since he had loaned money to the company in the past when necessary, his inaction with respect to the taxes suggested that he believed the company was meeting its obligations and the taxes were being paid.

A Texas district court found willfulness where an officer of a bankrupt company knew that the taxes were due but paid other creditors instead.

The Fifth Circuit has determined that the willfulness inquiry is the critical factor in most penalty cases, and that it requires only a voluntary, conscious, and intentional act, not a bad motive or evil intent. "A responsible person acts willfully if [s]he knows the taxes are due but uses corporate funds to pay other creditors, or if [s]he recklessly disregards the risk that the taxes may not be remitted to the government, or if, learning of the underpayment of taxes fails to use later-acquired available funds to pay the obligation.

Planning ahead

Is there any way for those with access to the inner workings of an employer's finances or tax responsibilities -- but without actual responsibility or knowledge of employment tax matters -- to protect themselves from the "responsible person" penalty? It may depend on which jurisdiction you're in -- although a survey of the courts suggests most are more willing than not to find liability. Otherwise, the wisest course may be to enter into an employment contract that carefully delineates and separates the duties and responsibilities -- and the expected scope of knowledge -- of an individual who might find himself with the dubious distinction of being responsible for a distinctly unexpected and undesirable drain on his finances.

The laws and requirements related to employment taxes can be complex and confusing with steep penalties for non-compliance. For additional assistance with your employment related tax issues, please contact the office for additional guidance.

How quickly could you convert your assets to cash if necessary? Do you have a quantitative way to evaluate management's effectiveness? Knowing your business' key financial ratios can provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of your operations and your ability to meet your financial obligations as well as help you chart your company's future.

How quickly could you convert your assets to cash if necessary? Do you have a quantitative way to evaluate management's effectiveness? Knowing your business' key financial ratios can provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of your operations and your ability to meet your financial obligations as well as help you chart your company's future.

Step 1: Calculate your ratios.

Acid Test: determines your company's ability to convert assets to cash to pay current obligations.

Cash & near cash

Current liabilities

Current Ratio measures your company's liquidity and ability to pay short-term debts.

Current assets

Current liabilities

Debt to Assets Ratio determines the extent to which your company is financed by debt.

Total debt

Total assets

Gross Profit Margin Rate: measures how much of each sales dollar can go for operating expenses and profit.

Gross Profit

Net Sales

Return on Assets (ROA): measures how much income is generated from your company's assets.

Net profit

Total assets

Step 2: Evaluate results.

Once you have calculated the ratios, you will need to be able to translate the numbers into results that relate to your business. Below are some examples of how you can use these ratios in your business:

Acid Test: A result of 2:0:1 means you have a two dollars' worth of easily convertible assets for each dollar of current liabilities.

Current Ratio A ratio of 2.0:1 means that the value of your current assets are twice that of what your current obligations are, a good indicator to a potential lender that your company is in sound financial condition.

Debt to Assets Ratio This ratio shows how many cents per dollar of assets are financed. An 82% ratio would indicate that your company's assets are heavily financed and may be a troubling sign to a potential lender.

Gross Profit Margin Ratio A ratio of .45:1 indicates that for every dollar of sales, your company has 45 cents to cover operating expenses and profit. This information can be used when setting pricing for your company's products and services.

Return on Assets Ratio (ROA): A ratio of .08:1 would mean that the company is bringing in 8 cents for every dollar of assets. These results can be used to determine the effectiveness of management's efforts to utilize assets.

Step 3: Compare to previous periods' results.

Take the results from the current period (e.g., this month) and deduct from the results of the previous period (e.g., last month). The result will be the net change in the ratio from one period to another. Because increases from period to period are good for one ratio (e.g., acid test) but maybe not so good for another (e.g., debt to assets ratio) it's important to analyze each ratio separately.

While changes in ratios don't always mean your company is getting off track, analyzing the cause of the changes can help uncover potential problem areas that need your attention.

There are many applications for key financial ratios to help you and your management team identify your company's strengths and weaknesses. If you would like any additional assistance with the calculation or analysis of your company's ratios, please contact the office.

Q. I have a professional services firm and am considering hiring my wife to help out with some of the administrative tasks in the office. I don't think we'll have a problem working together but I would like to have more information about the tax aspects of such an arrangement before I make the leap. What are some of the tax advantages of hiring my spouse?

Q. I have a professional services firm and am considering hiring my wife to help out with some of the administrative tasks in the office. I don't think we'll have a problem working together but I would like to have more information about the tax aspects of such an arrangement before I make the leap. What are some of the tax advantages of hiring my spouse?

A. Small business owners have long adhered to the practice of hiring family members to help them run their businesses -- results have ranged from very rewarding to absolutely disastrous. From a purely financial aspect, however, it is very important for you as a business owner to consider the tax advantages and potential pitfalls of hiring -- or continuing to employ -- family members in your small business.

Keeping it all in the family

Pay your family -- not Uncle Sam. Hiring family members can be a way of keeping more of your business income available for you and your family. The business gets a deduction for the wages paid -- as long as the family members are performing actual services in exchange for the compensation that they are receiving. This is true even though the family member will have to include the compensation received in income.

Some of the major tax advantages that often can be achieved through hiring a family member -- in this case, your spouse -- include:

Health insurance deduction. If you are self-employed and hire your spouse as a bona fide employee, your spouse -- as one of your employees -- can be given full health insurance coverage for all family members, including you as the business owner. This will convert the family health insurance premiums into a 100% deductible expense.

Company retirement plan participation. You may be able to deduct contributions made on behalf of your spouse to a company sponsored retirement plan if they are employees. The tax rules involved to put family members into your businesses retirement plan are quite complex, however, and generally require you to give equal treatment to all employees, whether or not related.

Travel expenses. If your spouse is an employee, you may be able to deduct the costs attributable to her or him accompanying you on business travel if both of you perform a legitimate business function while travelling.

IRA contributions. Paying your spouse a salary may enable them to make deductible IRA contributions based on the earned income that they receive, or Roth contributions that will accumulate tax-free for eventual tax-free distribution.

"Reasonable compensation"

In order for a business owner to realize any of the advantages connected with the hiring family members as discussed above, it is imperative for the family member to have engaged in bona fide work that merits the compensation being paid. Because this area has such a high potential for abuse, it's definitely a hot issue with the IRS. If compensation paid to a family member is deemed excessive, payments may be reclassified as gifts or as a means of equalizing payments to shareholders.

As you decide on how much to pay your spouse working in your business, keep in mind the reasonable compensation issue. Consider the going market rate for the work that is being done and pay accordingly. This conservative approach could save you money and headaches in the event of an audit by the IRS.

Hiring your spouse can be a rewarding and cost effective solution for your small business. However, in order to get the maximum benefit from such an arrangement, proper planning should be done. For additional guidance, please feel free to contact the office.

Stock options have become a common part of many compensation and benefits packages. Even small businesses have jumped on the bandwagon and now provide a perk previously confined to the executive suites of large publicly held companies. If you are an employee who has received stock options, you need to be aware of the complicated tax rules that govern certain stock options -- several potential "gotchas" exist and failing to spot them can cause major tax headaches.

Stock options have become a common part of many compensation and benefits packages. Even small businesses have jumped on the bandwagon and now provide a perk previously confined to the executive suites of large publicly held companies. If you are an employee who has received stock options, you need to be aware of the complicated tax rules that govern certain stock options -- several potential "gotchas" exist and failing to spot them can cause major tax headaches.

Over the past few years, the rules governing stock options have become increasingly complicated. More than ever, it is important that employees who receive stock options have a good understanding about how they are taxed -- on receipt of the option, at its exercise, or pursuant to the sale of the underlying stock -- as well as the potential consequences of their decisions regarding the timing of the taxation of those options.

NSOs vs ISOs

The most common type of stock option that employees receive is called a nonstatutory stock option (NSO). The other, less common type of stock option is generically referred to as an incentive stock option (ISO). ISOs are governed by very specific rules and are subjected to strict statutory requirements; NSOs, on the other hand, are subject to more general rules and guidelines.

Incentive stock options (ISOs) give the employee the right to purchase stock from the employer at a specified price. The employee is not taxed on the ISO at the time of its grant or at the time of the exercise of the option. Instead, he or she is taxed only at the time of the disposition of the stock acquired through exercise of the option. Note, however, the exercise of an ISO does give rise to an alternative minimum tax item in the amount of the difference between the option price and the market price of the stock.

Note. The IRS temporarily suspended the collection of ISO alternative minimum tax (AMT) liabilities through September 30, 2008.

NSOs also give the employee the right to purchase stock from the employer at a specified price. When and how an NSO is taxed depends on several factors including whether the underlying stock is substantially vested, and whether or not the fair market value of the stock is readily ascertainable.

Vesting. If an employee receives options from his employer, the tax consequences depend on whether the stock is vested. Stock you receive from your employer is "substantially vested" if it is either "transferable" by the employee or it is no longer subject to a "substantial risk of forfeiture". Property is "transferable" if you can sell, assign or pledge your interest in the option without the risk of losing it. A "substantial risk of forfeiture" exists if the rights in the property transferred depend on the future performance (or refraining from performance) of substantial services by any person, or the occurrence of a certain condition related to the transfer.

Readily ascertainable fair market value. An NSO always has a readily ascertainable fair market value when the option is publicly traded. When an option is not publicly traded, it can have a readily ascertainable fair market value if its value can be measured with reasonable accuracy. IRS rules spell out when fair market value can be measured with reasonable accuracy.

Generally, an employee who receives an NSO that has a readily ascertainable fair market value is subject to special tax rules under the Internal Revenue Code that apply to property received by a taxpayer in exchange for services when the option is granted. Under these rules, the option must be included in the employee's income as ordinary income in the amount of the fair market value in the year the option becomes substantially vested. If the employee paid for the option, he recognizes the value of the option minus its cost. The employee is not taxed again when he exercises the option and buys the corporate stock; he is taxed when the stock is sold. The gain or loss recognized when the employee sells the stock is capital in nature.

No readily ascertainable fair market value. Employees who receive NSOs from privately held companies are most likely to receive an NSO without a readily ascertainable fair market value. In general, when an NSO does not have a readily ascertainable fair market value, taxation occurs at the time when the option is exercised or transferred. The employee will recognize ordinary income in the amount of the value of the stock when it becomes substantially vested minus any amounts paid for the option or stock. The gain or loss recognized when the employee sells the stock is capital in nature. However, employees who have NSOs without a readily ascertainable fair market value also have the ability to elect to have the transaction taxed differently,

Section 83(b) election: Elector beware

Employees who exercise options that did not have a readily ascertainable fair market value when they were granted may elect to report income from the stock underlying the option at the time of the exercise rather than waiting until the stock is substantially vested. This election is referred to as a "Section 83(b) election" and is non-revocable. Once the election is made, any later subsequent appreciation when the stock becomes substantially vested would not be includible in income.

As you can see, the rules and tax laws related to stock options are indeed complicated and require some advance planning in order to avoid a big tax "gotcha". If you are contemplating entering into any transactions that involve stock options, please contact the office for additional guidance.

All of us will, at one time or another, incur financial losses - whether insubstantial or quite significant -- in our business and personal lives. When business fortunes head South -- either temporarily or in a more prolonged slide, it is important to be aware of how the tax law can limit the actual amount of your losses and your ability to deduct them. Here are some of the types of losses your business may experience and the related tax considerations to keep in mind in the event of a business downturn.

All of us will, at one time or another, incur financial losses - whether insubstantial or quite significant -- in our business and personal lives. When business fortunes head South -- either temporarily or in a more prolonged slide, it is important to be aware of how the tax law can limit the actual amount of your losses and your ability to deduct them. Here are some of the types of losses your business may experience and the related tax considerations to keep in mind in the event of a business downturn.

Bad debts

One loss that occurs frequently when business slows down is bad debt. A bad debt is simply a technical term used to describe a debt that has become totally or partially worthless. Different strategies apply depending upon whether you are the borrower or the lender.

As borrower. If you are the borrower, the "forgiveness" of all or part of the debt by the lender will generally trigger taxable income on that amount, unless the business is insolvent (debts exceed liabilities).

Note. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) allows some business to elect to recognize cancellation of indebtedness income over five years, beginning in 2014. The temporary benefit applies to specific types of business debt repurchased by the business after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2011. Under this provision, an applicable debt instrument includes a bond, note, certificate, debenture, or other instrument that constitutes indebtedness issued by a C corporation or any other "person" in connection with the conduct of trade or business by that person. This election is irrevocable. Moreover, the liquidation or sale of substantially all the taxpayer's assets can result in acceleration of deferred items.

Although recognizing income may not be an immediate problem for a business that has plenty of losses to net against current income, additional income may wash out a net operating loss carryover that can either provide an immediate refund for a past tax year or shelter from income in the future. As a result, some businesses re-define debt "forgiveness" into a non-taxable event, such as a refinancing or a business-generated settlement.

As lender. If you are the lender, your major tax concern will be proving that a real debt exists, and then determining how fast you can deduct the bad debt and whether the deduction can offset ordinary income, as opposed to just capital gains.

Loans between corporations and their shareholders are scrutinized to make sure that they are really debts rather than disguised dividends or contributions to the corporation's capital. You can protect yourself by taking the steps that an arm's-length lender would take, such as putting it in writing and charging a reasonable rate of interest.

The IRS sometimes requires taxpayers to play a guessing game about which tax year a debt becomes sufficiently worthless to support the deduction. Because of potential statute of limitations problems, tax experts generally recommend that you claim the loss in the earliest possible year that it can reasonably be argued to be worthless.

Finally, you must determine whether a business or nonbusiness bad debt exists. A business bad debt must be created or acquired, or become worthless, in the course of your trade or business. If you conduct a business in the form of a corporation, generally any debt held by the corporation is a business debt. Any debt not falling into the business category is a nonbusiness debt.

As guarantor. If you take out a loan on behalf of your corporation or you personally guarantee the loan and then must make good on it, you are usually considered to have either made a contribution to capital or created a nonbusiness bad debt to protect your position as an investor. A nonbusiness debt must be completely worthless before a loss can be taken. Furthermore, nonbusiness bad debts are subject to limits on capital losses. Business bad debts, on the other hand, are deductible as ordinary losses in full against your other income.

Net operating losses

If you show a net operating loss for the year, it normally may be carried back two years or carried forward up to 20 years until it can be netted against current taxable income. A net operating loss (NOL) for this purpose has some complexity built in to strip it of most personal tax characteristics. An individual's NOL, for example, does not include any offset for personal or dependency exemptions, for net nonbusiness capital losses, or for nonbusiness itemized deductions that exceed nonbusiness income. Another choice in dealing with an NOL is to elect to immediately carryforward the loss. This can be advantageous when high rate-bracket income is anticipated in the following year.

Note. The 2009 Recovery Act provides a five-year carryback of 2008 NOLs for qualified small businesses only. These are small businesses with average gross receipts of $15 million or less. Businesses can choose to carryback NOLs three, four or five years. This treatment applies only to NOLs for any tax year beginning or ending in 2008. The normal NOL carryback period returns in for NOLs incurred in 2009.

Pass-through losses

One of the advantages of investing in a business as a partner or a subchapter S shareholder is that losses on the business level get passed-through to your individual tax return. Regular corporations, on the other hand, file separate returns and the shareholder cannot "realize" a tax loss until he or she actually sells stock.

For both partners and S shareholders, however, the ability to deduct pass-through losses is determined by the amount of tax basis the partner has in his partnership interest or the S shareholder has in his shares. This, in turn, depends upon a variety of factors, including the original price paid, the amount of losses already passed through, cash or property distributed, and any later contributions.

If you have such a stake in a business, a tax strategy for both adding to basis and preventing its diminution is critical to your ability to be able to deduct business losses as a partner or S shareholder.

Section 1244 Stock

If you sell stock at a loss and that stock had been designated on its issuance to be "Section 1244 stock," you are more fortunate than most investors who bail out during a business downturn. Reason: you are entitled to an ordinary loss deduction rather than a capital loss. This special loss treatment is limited to $50,000 for any one year ($100,000 for joint returns). Other requirements are that the stock was issued for no more than $1 million, less than 50% of corporate receipts were from passive sources for the first five years of operation, and the shareholder claiming the treatment must be an individual.

Dealing with and making the most of losses related to a business downturn can get complicated. Because the preceding discussion is meant to be general, is limited in nature and does not cover all the tax rules involved, you are encourage to contact the office for additional guidance with this issue.