Newsletters

The Treasury Department and the IRS have proposed regulations that identify occupations that customarily and regularly receive tips, and define "qualified tips" that eligible tip recipients may claim for the "no tax on tips" deduction under Code Sec. 224. This deduction was enacted as part of the the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21).

The Treasury Department and the IRS have proposed regulations that identify occupations that customarily and regularly receive tips, and define "qualified tips" that eligible tip recipients may claim for the "no tax on tips" deduction under Code Sec. 224. This deduction was enacted as part of the the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21).

Background

Under Code Sec. 224, an eligible individual can claim an income tax deduction for qualified tips received in tax years 2025 through 2028. The deduction is limited to $25,000 per tax year, and starts to phase out when modified adjusted gross income is above $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers).

An employer must report qualified tips on an employee‘s Form W-2, or the employee must report the tips on Form 4137. A service recipient must report qualified tips on an information return furnished to a nonemployee payee (Form 1099-NEC, Form 1099-MISC, Form 1099-K).

If an individual tip recipient is "married" (under Code Sec. 7703), the deduction applies only if the individual and his or her spouse file a joint return. The deduction is not allowed unless the taxpayer includes his or her social security number (SSN) on their income tax return for the tax year. For this purpose, a SSN is valid only if it is issued to a U.S. citizen or a person authorized to work in the United States, and before the due date of the taxpayer’s return.

What is a Qualified Tip?

A "qualified tip" is a cash tip received in an occupation that customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024. An amount is not a qualified tip unless (1) the amount received is paid voluntarily without any consequence for nonpayment, is not the subject of negotiation, and is determined by the payor; (2) the trade or business in which the individual receives the amount is not a specified service trade or business under Code Sec. 199A(d)(2); and (3) other requirements established in regulations or other guidance are satisfied.

The proposed regulations define qualified tips—and payments that are not qualified tips— based on several factors, including the following:

• Qualified tips must be paid in cash or an equivalent medium, such as check, credit card, debit card, gift card, tangible or intangible tokens that are readily exchangeable for a fixed amount in cash, or another form of electronic settlement or mobile payment application that is denominated in cash.

• Qualified tips do not include items paid in any medium other than cash, such as event tickets, meals, services, or other assets that are not exchangeable for a fixed amount in cash (such as most digital assets).

• Qualified tips must be received from customers. For employees, qualified tips can be received through a mandatory or voluntary tip-sharing arrangement, such as a tip pool.

• Qualified tips must be paid voluntarily by the customer, and not be subject to negotiation.

• Qualified tips do not include some service charges. For example, if a restaurant imposes an automatic 18-percent service charge for large parties and distributes that amount to waiters, bussers and kitchen staff, the amounts distributed are not qualified tips if the charge is added with no option for the customer to disregard or modify it.

• Qualified tips do not include amounts received for an illegal activity (a service the performance of which is a felony or misdemeanor under applicable law), prostitution services, or pornographic activity.

• Qualified tips do not include tips received by an employee or other service provider who has an ownership interest in or is employed by the tip payor.

The proposed regulations also include examples that illustrate some of the requirements and restrictions.

Occupations that Customarily and Regularly Receive Tips

The proposed regulations list the occupations that customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024. For each occupation, the list provides a numeric Treasury Tipped Occupation Code (TTOC), an occupation title, a description of the types of services performed in the occupation, illustrative examples of specific occupations, and the related Standard Occupation Classification (SOC) system code(s) published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

The list groups the eligible occupations into eight categories:

• Beverage and Food Service—includes bartenders; wait staff; food servers outside of a restaurant; dining room and cafeteria attendants and bartender helpers; chefs and cooks; food preparation workers; fast food and counter workers; dishwashers; host staff, restaurant, lounge, and coffee shop; bakers

• Entertainment and Events—includes gambling dealers; gambling change persons and booth cashiers; gambling cage workers; gambling and sports book writers and runners; dancers; musicians and singers; disc jockeys (but not radio disc jockeys); entertainers and performers; digital content creators; ushers, lobby attendants, and ticket takers; locker room, coatroom, and dressing room attendants

• Hospitality and Guest Services—includes baggage porters and bellhops; concierges; hotel, motel, and resort desk clerks; maids and housekeeping cleaners

• Home Services—includes home maintenance and repair workers; home landscaping and groundskeeping workers; home electricians; home plumbers; home heating and air conditioning mechanics and installers; home appliance installers and repairers; home cleaning service workers; locksmiths; roadside assistance workers

• Personal Services—includes personal care and service workers; private event planners; private event and portrait photographers; private event videographers; event officiants; pet caretakers; tutors; nannies and babysitters

• Personal Appearance and Wellness—includes skincare specialists; massage therapists; barbers, hairdressers , hairstylists, and cosmetologists; shampooers; manicurists and pedicurists; eyebrow threading and waxing technicians; makeup artists; exercise trainers and group fitness instructors; tattoo artists and piercers; tailors; shoe and leather workers and repairers

• Recreation and Instruction—includes golf caddies; self-enrichment teachers; recreational and tour pilots; tour guides; travel guides; sports and recreation instructors

• Transportation and Delivery—includes parking and valet attendants; taxi and rideshare drivers and chauffeurs; shuttle drivers; goods delivery people; personal vehicle and equipment cleaners; private and charter bus drivers; water taxi operators and charter boat workers; rickshaw, pedicab, and carriage drivers; home movers

Applicability Dates

The proposed regulations apply for tax years beginning after December 31, 2024. Taxpayers may rely on the proposed regulations for those tax years, and on or before the date the final regulations are published in the Federal Register, but only if the proposed regulations are followed in their entirety and in a consistent manner.

Request for Comments, Public Hearing

Written or electronic comments must be received by October 22, 2025 (30 days after the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register). Comments may be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov), or on paper submitted to: CC:PA:01:PR (REG-110032-25), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044.

A public hearing is being held on October 23, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time (ET). Requests to speak and outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing must be received by October 22, 2025; if no outlines are received by that date, the public hearing will be cancelled. Requests to attend the public hearing must be received by 5:00 p.m. ET on October 21, 2023.

Proposed Regulations, NPRM REG-110032-25

The IRS issued final regulations implementing the Roth catch-up contribution requirement and other statutory changes to catch-up contributions made by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-328). The regulations affect qualified retirement plans that allow catch-up contributions (including 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, governmental plans, SEPs and SIMPLE plans) and their participants. The regulations generally apply for contribtions in tax years beginning after December 31, 2026, with extensions for collectively bargained, multiemployer, and governmental plans. However, plans may elect to apply the final rules in earlier tax years.

The IRS issued final regulations implementing the Roth catch-up contribution requirement and other statutory changes to catch-up contributions made by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-328). The regulations affect qualified retirement plans that allow catch-up contributions (including 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, governmental plans, SEPs and SIMPLE plans) and their participants. The regulations generally apply for contribtions in tax years beginning after December 31, 2026, with extensions for collectively bargained, multiemployer, and governmental plans. However, plans may elect to apply the final rules in earlier tax years.

The SECURE 2.0 Act amended the catch-up contribution provision to allow an increased contribution limit for participants aged 60 through 63 and an increased contribution limit for certain SIMPLE plans. The final regulations provide that SIMPLE plans may allow participant to take advantage of one of these increased contribution limits, but not both. However, beginning with the 2025 calendar year, a SIMPLE plan that provides for increased contribution limits for all participants may instead permit participants attaining age 60 to 63 to contribute the full amount allowed for that age group.

With respect to mandatory Roth catch-up contributions for particpants whose income exceeds a statutory threshold, the final regulations allow 401(k) and 403(b) plans to automatically treat catch-up contributions as Roth for affected participants, provided an opt-out opportunity is offered. The final regulations do not include a rule allowing deemed Roth elections for all employees' catch-up contributions, only for those employees whose income exceeds the threshold. In response to comments, the final regulations provide that deemed elections must cease within a reasonable period of time following the date on which the employee no longer meets the mandatory Roth threshold or an amended Form W-2 is filed or furnished to the employee indicating that the employee no longer meets the mandatory Roth threshold. As a result, Roth catch-up contributions made pursuant to the deemed election before the end of the reasonable period of time need not be recharacterized as pre-tax catch-up contributions. The IRS further indicated that the plan must be amended to implement deemed Roth elections, and that the deadline for adopting amendments implementing the SECURE 2.0 Act is generally December 31, 2026.

The final regulations provide two correction methods to address pre-tax contributions that should have been designated Roth. First, a plan may transfer pre-tax contributions to the participant's Roth account and report the contribution as an elective deferral that is a designated Roth contribution on the participant's Form W-2. This correction method is available only if the participant's Form W-2 for that year has not yet been filed or furnished to the participant. Alternatively, the plan can directly roll over the elective deferrals that would be catch-up contributions if they had been designated Roth contributions (adjusted for earnings and losses) from the participant’s pre-tax account to the participant’s designated Roth account and report the rollover on Form 1099-R. Failures do not need to be corrected if the amount of the pre-tax elective deferral that was required to be a designated Roth contribution does not exceed $250, or if the participant was incorrectly treated as subject to the Roth catch-up contribution requirement due to a Form W-2 that is later amended.

T.D. 10033

IR-2025-91

Revenue Procedure 2025-28 instructs taxpayers on how to make various elections, file amended returns or change accounting methods for research or experimental expenditures as provided under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21). The revenue procedure also provides transitional rules, modifies Rev. Proc. 2025-23, and grants an extension of time for partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, estates and trusts, and exempt organizations to file superseding 2024 federal income tax returns.

Revenue Procedure 2025-28 instructs taxpayers on how to make various elections, file amended returns or change accounting methods for research or experimental expenditures as provided under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21). The revenue procedure also provides transitional rules, modifies Rev. Proc. 2025-23, and grants an extension of time for partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, estates and trusts, and exempt organizations to file superseding 2024 federal income tax returns.

Background

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) required taxpayers to capitalize and amortize specified research or experimental expenditures over 5 years for domestic research or 15 years for foreign research, beginning with taxable years after December 31, 2021. The OBBB Act, enacted July 4, significantly modified these rules by adding new Code Sec. 174A to allow immediate deduction of domestic research or experimental expenditures while retaining the capitalization and amortization requirements only for foreign research expenditures.

Code Sec. 174A provides that domestic research or experimental expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, are generally deductible when paid or incurred. Alternatively, taxpayers may elect under Code Sec. 174A(c) to capitalize these expenditures and amortize them over at least 60 months, beginning when the taxpayer first realizes benefits from the expenditures.

The OBBB Act also provides transition relief, including retroactive application options for small business taxpayers and methods for recovering previously capitalized amounts.

Code Sec. 280C(c)(2) Elections and Revocations

Eligible small business taxpayers may make late elections under Code Sec. 280C(c)(2) to reduce their research credit in lieu of reducing their deductible research expenditures or revoke prior Code Sec. 280C(c)(2) elections. These are available for applicable taxable years where the original return was filed before September 15, 2025.

Elections are made by adjusting the research credit amount on amended returns, attaching amended Form 6765 marked with the appropriate revenue procedure reference, and including required declarations.

Code Sec. 174A(c) Election Procedures

For domestic research or experimental expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, taxpayers may elect to capitalize and amortize these expenditures under Code Sec. 174A(c). The election must be made by the due date of the return for the first applicable taxable year by attaching a statement specifying the amortization period (not less than 60 months) and the month when benefits are first realized.

Automatic Consent for Accounting Method Changes

Rev. Proc. 2025-28 modifies Rev. Proc. 2025-23 to provide automatic consent procedures for various accounting method changes related to research expenditures:

changes to comply with Code Sec. 174 for expenditures paid or incurred before January 1, 2025;

changes to implement the new Code Sec. 174A deduction or amortization methods for expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 2024; and

changes to comply with modified Code Sec. 174 requirements for foreign research expenditures.

For the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2024, taxpayers may use statements in lieu of Form 3115 for certain accounting method changes, with simplified procedures and waived duplicate filing requirements.

Small Business Retroactive Election

Small business taxpayers meeting the Code Sec. 448(c) gross receipts test (average annual gross receipts of $31,000,000 or less for 2025) may elect to retroactively apply Code Sec. 174A to domestic research or experimental expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021. This election allows eligible taxpayers to either deduct these expenditures in the year paid or incurred or elect the Code Sec. 174A(c) amortization method.

The election is made by attaching a statement entitled "FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.03 OF REV. PROC. 2025-28" to the taxpayer's original or amended federal income tax return for each applicable taxable year. The statement must include the taxpayer's identification information, declarations regarding tax shelter status and gross receipts test compliance, and specification of the chosen method.

Elections made on amended returns must be filed by July 6, 2026, subject to the normal statute of limitations under Code Sec. 6511 for refund claims.

Relief for Previously Filed Returns

Rev. Proc. 2025-28 grants automatic six-month extensions for eligible taxpayers to file superseding returns for 2024 taxable years. This relief is available to taxpayers who filed returns before September 15, 2025, without extensions, and need to make elections or method changes provided by the revenue procedure.

The extension applies to partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, trusts, estates, and exempt organizations with 2024 taxable years ending before September 15, 2025, where the original due date was before September 15, 2025.

Effective Date

Most provisions of Rev. Proc. 2025-28 are effective August 28, 2025. The modified automatic change procedures apply to Forms 3115 filed after August 28, 2025, with transition rules for taxpayers who properly filed duplicate copies before November 15, 2025.

Rev. Proc. 2025-28

The shareholders of S corporations engaged in cannabis sales could not include wages disallowed under Code Sec. 280E when calculating the Code Sec. 199A deduction. The Court reasoned that only wages "properly allocable to qualified business income" qualify, and nondeductible wages cannot be so allocated under the statute.

The shareholders of S corporations engaged in cannabis sales could not include wages disallowed under Code Sec. 280E when calculating the Code Sec. 199A deduction. The Court reasoned that only wages "properly allocable to qualified business income" qualify, and nondeductible wages cannot be so allocated under the statute.

The individuals owned three S corporations and reported pass-through income for the tax years at issue. Two corporations, engaged in cannabis sales, were subject to Code Sec. 280E, which bars deductions for expenses of businesses trafficking in controlled substances. Both entities paid significant W-2 wages, but portions were nondeductible under Code Sec. 280E. Petitioners claimed the full amount of reported wages in computing the Code Sec. 199A deduction.

The IRS reduced the deductions, asserting that only deductible wages could count as W-2 wages under Code Sec. 199A. The Court agreed, finding that Code Sec. 199A(b)(4)(B) excludes any amount not "properly allocable to qualified business income," and Code Sec. 199A(c)(3)(A)(ii) limits qualified items to those "allowed in determining taxable income." Because nondeductible wages are not allowed in determining taxable income, they cannot be W-2 wages. "Although certain amounts may have been reported by an employer to an employee in a Form W-2," the Court explained, "those amounts do not constitute "W-2 wages" for purposes of 199A if they are not properly allocated to qualified business income."

A dissenting judge argued that Congress intended the wage limitation to encourage job creation and that wages properly allocable to a trade or business should count regardless of deductibility. The majority, however, concluded that statutory text foreclosed this interpretation.

A.A. Savage, 165 TC No. 5, Dec. 62,714

A married couple was not entitled to claim a plug-in vehicle credit after the year in which their vehicle was first placed in service. 

A married couple was not entitled to claim a plug-in vehicle credit after the year in which their vehicle was first placed in service. The Tax Court explained that Code Sec. 30D provides a one-time credit available only in the year a qualified vehicle is first placed in service, meaning when it is ready and available for its intended function. The couple purchased a new plug-in electric vehicle and continued to claim the credit in later years. The IRS disallowed the credit for the tax year at issue and determined a deficiency. An accuracy-related penalty was also proposed but later conceded. Relying on regulations interpreting similar provisions under the general business credit, the Court emphasized that once the vehicle was in use in the year of purchase, it was considered placed in service. Accordingly, the Court held that the credit could not be claimed again in subsequent years.

A. Moon, 165 TC No. 4, Dec. 62,712

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has proposed regulations that would amend the Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Program and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) Filing Requirements for registered investment advisers (IA AML Rule) by delaying the obligations of covered investment advisers from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2028. 

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has proposed regulations that would amend the Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Program and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) Filing Requirements for registered investment advisers (IA AML Rule) by delaying the obligations of covered investment advisers from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2028. The proposed regulation follows an exemptive relief order issued earlier this summer (FinCEN Exemptive Relief Order, August 5, 2025).

The IA AML Rule requires covered investment advisers to establish AML/CFT programs, report suspicious activity, and keep relevant records, among other requirements.

By delaying the effective date, FinCEN states that it will have an opportunity to review the IA AML Rule, and ensure that the rule is effectively tailored to the diverse business models and risk profiles of firms in the investment adviser sector. According to FinCEN, the review may also provide an opportunity to reduce any unnecessary or duplicative regulatory burden, and ensure the IA AML Rule strikes an appropriate balance between cost and benefit, while still adequately protecting the U.S. financial system and guarding against money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit finance risks.

Request for Comments

FinCEN invites interested parties to submit comments on the proposed delay in the effective date of the IA AML Rule. Written or electronic comments must be received by October 22, 2025 (30 days after the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register). Comments may be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov), or by mail to: Policy Division, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183. Refer to Docket Number FINCEN-2025-0072 and RIN 1506-AB58 and 1506-AB69.

FinCEN Proposed Rule RIN-1506-AB58 and 1506-AB69

Q:  One of my children received a full scholarship for all expenses to attend college this year.  I had heard that this amount may not be required to be reported on his tax return if certain conditions were met and the funds were used specifically for certain types of her expenses.  Is this true and what amounts spent on my child's education will be treated as qualified expenses?

Q: One of my children received a full scholarship for all expenses to attend college this year. I had heard that this amount may not be required to be reported on his tax return if certain conditions were met and the funds were used specifically for certain types of her expenses. Is this true and what amounts spent on my child's education will be treated as qualified expenses?

A: Any amount received as a "qualified scholarship" or fellowship is not required to be reported as income if your child is a candidate for a degree at an educational institution. For the college that your child attends to be treated as an educational organization, it must (1) be an institution that has as its primary function the presentation of formal instruction, (2) normally maintain a regular faculty and curriculum, and (3) have a regularly enrolled body of students in attendance at the place where the educational activities are regularly carried on. Your child has received a qualified scholarship if he or she can establish, that in accordance with the conditions of the scholarship, the funds received were used for qualified tuition and related expenses.

Qualified tuition and related expenses include tuition and fees required for enrollment or attendance at the educational institution, as well as any fees, books, supplies, and equipment required for courses of instruction at the educational institution. To be treated as related expenses, the fees, books supplies, and equipment must be required of all students in the particular course of instruction. Incidental expenses, such as expenses for room and board, travel, research, equipment, and other expenses that are not required for either enrollment or attendance at the educational institution are not treated as related expenses. Any amounts that are used for room, board and other incidental expenses are not excluded from income.

Example: Assume this year your son received a scholarship in the amount of $20,000 to pay for expenses at a qualified educational institution. His expenses included $12,000 for tuition; $1,100 for books; $900 for lab supplies and fees; and $6,000 for food, housing, clothing, laundry, and other living expenses.

The $14,000 that your son paid for tuition, books and lab supplies and fees are considered to be qualified educational expenses and therefore would not have to be reported as income. The $6,000 that he spent on housing and the other living expenses is considered to be incidental expenses and would have to be reported in his income.

Note: This tax exclusion for qualified scholarships should not be confused with the Hope Scholarship Tax Credit, which has been temporarily renamed the American Opportunity Tax Credit and enhanced for 2009 and 2010 by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The American Opportunity Tax Credit can reach as high as $2,500 for 2009 and 2010 for tuition expenses paid by you for yourself, a spouse or a dependent. Scholarship money that is excluded from income cannot be used in computing your costs for the American Opportunity Tax Credit (i.e. Hope Scholarship Tax Credit). "Financial aid" in the form of student loans, however, is not counted as a scholarship and any money applied to pay tuition can qualify for the Hope Scholarship Tax Credit.

There can be all sorts of complicating factors in assessing whether a particular scholarship will be taxed, such as the treatment of work-study scholarships, educational sabbaticals, scholarships paid by an employer, and stipends to cover the tax on the non-tuition portion of attending a university. If you need additional assistance in determining the taxability of scholarships funds, please contact the office.

Q:The holidays are approaching and I would like to consider giving gifts of appreciation to my employees. What kinds of gifts can I give my employees that they would not have to declare as income on their tax returns? I also would like to make sure my company would be able to deduct the costs of these gifts.

A:First of all, anything given in the business setting is presumed, until proven otherwise, not to be a gift (e.g., is taxable income) -- that is, you are either rewarding an employee for work done or providing an incentive in which he or she will be inclined to do more work in the future. However, the Tax Code and related IRS regulations still allow many gifts to remain tax-free to the employee while being tax deductible to the business. Here is a short list of the rules:

$25 gift rule

A business may deduct up to $25 in gifts given to each recipient during any given year. However, you can't get around this limit by giving to each family member of the intended recipient: they all share in one $25 limit. Items clearly of an advertising nature such as promotional items do not count as long as the item costs $4 or less.

No dollar limit exists on a deduction if the gift is given to a corporation or a partnership. The cost of gifts such as baseball tickets that will be used by an unidentified group of employees also qualifies for the unlimited deduction. However, once again, if the gift is intended eventually to go to a particular individual shareholder or partner, the deduction is limited to $25.

Separate "de minimis" rules

A "de minimis" fringe benefit from employer to employee is considered to be made tax-free to the employee. "De minimis" fringe benefits are not restricted by the $25 per recipient limit otherwise applicable outside of the employer-employee context. However, de minimis fringe benefits must be small "within reason." Typical de minimis gifts include holiday gifts such as a turkey or ham, the occasional company picnic, occasional use of the photocopy machine, occasional supper money, or flowers sent to a sick employee.

The general guidelines for de minimis fringe benefits are:

• the value of the gift must be nominal,
• accounting for all such gifts would be administratively nitpicking,
• the gifts are only occasional, and
• they are given "to promote health, good will, contentment, or efficiency" of employees.

Unfortunately, "gifts of nominal value" exclude such perks as use of a company lodge, season theater tickets, or country club dues. These cannot be given tax-free to an employee. But they do include occasional theater or sports tickets or group meals.

What's more, fringe benefits such as the use of an on-premise athletic facility or subsidized cafeteria are specifically included under IRS rules as de minimis fringe benefits. The traditional gold retirement watch -- or similar gift-- to commemorate a long period of employment is also treated as de minimis. However, cash or items readily convertible into cash, such as gift certificates, are taxable, no matter what the amount.

Dual-income families are commonplace these days, however, some couples are discovering that their second income may not be worth the added aggravation and effort. After taking into consideration daycare expenses, commuting expenses, the countless take-out meals, and additional clothing costs, many are surprised at how much (or how little) of that second income is actually hitting their bank account.

Dual-income families are commonplace these days, however, some couples are discovering that their second income may not be worth the added aggravation and effort. After taking into consideration daycare expenses, commuting expenses, the countless take-out meals, and additional clothing costs, many are surprised at how much (or how little) of that second income is actually hitting their bank account.

Before you and your spouse head off for yet another hectic workweek, it may be worth your time to take a few moments to do a few simple calculations. After assessing what expenditures are necessary in order for both parents to work outside of the home, many couples quickly realize that their second income is essentially paying for the second person to be working.

Crunch the numbers. To determine whether your second income is worth the energy, you will need to calculate the estimated value of the second income. First determine how much the second income brings in after taxes. Then subtract expenses incurred due to the second person working, such as dry cleaning expenses, childcare bills, transportation costs, housecleaning services, landscaping services, and outside dining expenses. The result will be the estimated value of the second person working.

Consider the long-term. Even if your result turns out to be small, you may find that having the second person working will be beneficial to the household in the long run. However, don't forget to consider that, by losing the second income, you may also be losing future retirement benefits and social security earnings.

Take a "dry run". Before reducing down to one income, try living on the person's income you intend to keep for six months, stashing the other income into an emergency savings account. If you are able to do this, chances are you will be able to endure for the long haul.

Many different factors can affect a family's decision to have both parents work - including the fulfillment each parent may get from working regardless of whether their income is adding significantly to the household. However, if trying to make ends meet is the major reason, it may pay off to spend some time analyzing the real net benefit from that second income. If you need any assistance while determining if both spouses should work or not, please feel free to contact the office.

Employers are required by the Internal Revenue Code to calculate, withhold, and deposit with the IRS all federal employment taxes related to wages paid to employees. Failure to comply with these requirements can find certain "responsible persons" held personally liable. Who is a responsible person for purposes of employment tax obligations? The broad interpretation defined by the courts and the IRS may surprise you.

Employers are required by the Internal Revenue Code to calculate, withhold, and deposit with the IRS all federal employment taxes related to wages paid to employees. Failure to comply with these requirements can find certain "responsible persons" held personally liable. Who is a responsible person for purposes of employment tax obligations? The broad interpretation defined by the courts and the IRS may surprise you.

Employer's responsibility regarding employment taxes

Employment taxes such as federal income tax, social security (FICA) tax, unemployment (FUTA) tax and various state taxes (note that state issues are not addressed in this article) are all required to be withheld from an employee's wages. Wages are defined in the Code and the accompanying IRS regulations as all remuneration for services performed by an employee for an employer, including the value of remuneration, such as benefits, paid in any form other than cash. The employer is responsible for depositing withheld taxes (along with related employer taxes) with the IRS in a timely manner.

100% penalty for non-compliance

Although the employer entity is required by law to withhold and pay over employment taxes, the penalty provisions of the Code are enforceable against any responsible person who willfully fails to withhold, account for, or pay over withholding tax to the government. The trust fund recovery penalty -- equal to 100% of the tax not withheld and/or paid over -- is a collection device that is normally assessed only if the tax can't be collected from the employer entity itself. Once assessed, however, this steep penalty becomes a personal liability of the responsible person(s) that can wreak havoc on their personal financial situation -- even personal bankruptcy is not an "out" as this penalty is not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

A corporation, partnership, limited liability or other form of doing business won't insulate a "responsible person" from this obligation. But who is a responsible person for purposes of withholding and paying over employment taxes, and ultimately the possible resulting penalty for noncompliance? Also, what constitutes "willful failure to pay and/or withhold"? To give you a better understanding of your potential liability as an employer or employee, these questions are addressed below.

Who are "responsible persons"?

Typically, the types of individuals who are deemed "responsible persons" for purposes of the employment tax withholding and payment are corporate officers or employees whose job description includes managing and paying employment taxes on behalf of the employer entity.

However, the type of responsibility targeted by the Code and regulations includes familiarity with and/or control over functions that are involved in the collection and deposit of employment taxes. Unfortunately for potential targets, Internal Revenue Code Section 6672 doesn't define the term, and the courts and the IRS have not formulated a specific rule that can be applied to determine who is or is not a "responsible person." Recent cases have found the courts ruling both ways, with the IRS generally applying a broad, comprehensive standard.

A Texas district court, for example, looked at the duties performed by an executive -- and rejected her argument that responsibility should only be assigned to the person with the greatest control over the taxes. Responsibility was not limited to the person with the most authority -- it could be assigned to any number of people so long as they all had sufficient knowledge and capability.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has delineated six nonexclusive factors to determine responsibility for purposes of the penalty: whether the person: (1) is an officer or member of the board of directors; (2) owns a substantial amount of stock in the company; (3) manages the day-to-day operations of the business; (4) has the authority to hire or fire employees; (5) makes decisions as to the disbursement of funds and payment of creditors; and (6) possesses the authority to sign company checks. No one factor is dispositive, according to the court, but it is clear that the court looks to the individual's authority; what he or she could do, not what he or she actually did -- or knew.

The Ninth Circuit recently cited similar factors, holding that whether an individual had knowledge that the taxes were unpaid was irrelevant; instead, said the court, responsibility is a matter of status, duty, and authority, not knowledge. Agreeing with the Texas district court, above, the court held that the penalty provision of Code section 6672 doesn't confine liability for unpaid taxes to the single officer with the greatest control or authority over corporate affairs.

Suffice it to say that, under the various courts' interpretations -- or that of the IRS -- many corporate managers and officers who are neither assigned nor assume any actual responsibility for the regular withholding, collection or deposit of federal employment taxes would be surprised to find that they could be responsible for taxes that should have been paid over by the employer entity but weren't.

What constitutes "willful failure" to comply?

Once it has been established that an individual qualifies as a responsible person, he must also be found to have acted willfully in failing to withhold and pay the taxes. Although it may be easier to establish the ingredients for "responsibility," some courts have focused on the requirement that the individual's failure be willful, relying on various means to divine his or her intent.

An Arizona district court, for example, found that a retired company owner who had turned over the operation of his business to his children while maintaining only consultant status was indeed a responsible person -- but concluded that his past actions indicated that he did not willfully cause the nonpayment of the company's employment taxes. Since he had loaned money to the company in the past when necessary, his inaction with respect to the taxes suggested that he believed the company was meeting its obligations and the taxes were being paid.

A Texas district court found willfulness where an officer of a bankrupt company knew that the taxes were due but paid other creditors instead.

The Fifth Circuit has determined that the willfulness inquiry is the critical factor in most penalty cases, and that it requires only a voluntary, conscious, and intentional act, not a bad motive or evil intent. "A responsible person acts willfully if [s]he knows the taxes are due but uses corporate funds to pay other creditors, or if [s]he recklessly disregards the risk that the taxes may not be remitted to the government, or if, learning of the underpayment of taxes fails to use later-acquired available funds to pay the obligation.

Planning ahead

Is there any way for those with access to the inner workings of an employer's finances or tax responsibilities -- but without actual responsibility or knowledge of employment tax matters -- to protect themselves from the "responsible person" penalty? It may depend on which jurisdiction you're in -- although a survey of the courts suggests most are more willing than not to find liability. Otherwise, the wisest course may be to enter into an employment contract that carefully delineates and separates the duties and responsibilities -- and the expected scope of knowledge -- of an individual who might find himself with the dubious distinction of being responsible for a distinctly unexpected and undesirable drain on his finances.

The laws and requirements related to employment taxes can be complex and confusing with steep penalties for non-compliance. For additional assistance with your employment related tax issues, please contact the office for additional guidance.

How quickly could you convert your assets to cash if necessary? Do you have a quantitative way to evaluate management's effectiveness? Knowing your business' key financial ratios can provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of your operations and your ability to meet your financial obligations as well as help you chart your company's future.

How quickly could you convert your assets to cash if necessary? Do you have a quantitative way to evaluate management's effectiveness? Knowing your business' key financial ratios can provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of your operations and your ability to meet your financial obligations as well as help you chart your company's future.

Step 1: Calculate your ratios.

Acid Test: determines your company's ability to convert assets to cash to pay current obligations.

Cash & near cash

Current liabilities

Current Ratio measures your company's liquidity and ability to pay short-term debts.

Current assets

Current liabilities

Debt to Assets Ratio determines the extent to which your company is financed by debt.

Total debt

Total assets

Gross Profit Margin Rate: measures how much of each sales dollar can go for operating expenses and profit.

Gross Profit

Net Sales

Return on Assets (ROA): measures how much income is generated from your company's assets.

Net profit

Total assets

Step 2: Evaluate results.

Once you have calculated the ratios, you will need to be able to translate the numbers into results that relate to your business. Below are some examples of how you can use these ratios in your business:

Acid Test: A result of 2:0:1 means you have a two dollars' worth of easily convertible assets for each dollar of current liabilities.

Current Ratio A ratio of 2.0:1 means that the value of your current assets are twice that of what your current obligations are, a good indicator to a potential lender that your company is in sound financial condition.

Debt to Assets Ratio This ratio shows how many cents per dollar of assets are financed. An 82% ratio would indicate that your company's assets are heavily financed and may be a troubling sign to a potential lender.

Gross Profit Margin Ratio A ratio of .45:1 indicates that for every dollar of sales, your company has 45 cents to cover operating expenses and profit. This information can be used when setting pricing for your company's products and services.

Return on Assets Ratio (ROA): A ratio of .08:1 would mean that the company is bringing in 8 cents for every dollar of assets. These results can be used to determine the effectiveness of management's efforts to utilize assets.

Step 3: Compare to previous periods' results.

Take the results from the current period (e.g., this month) and deduct from the results of the previous period (e.g., last month). The result will be the net change in the ratio from one period to another. Because increases from period to period are good for one ratio (e.g., acid test) but maybe not so good for another (e.g., debt to assets ratio) it's important to analyze each ratio separately.

While changes in ratios don't always mean your company is getting off track, analyzing the cause of the changes can help uncover potential problem areas that need your attention.

There are many applications for key financial ratios to help you and your management team identify your company's strengths and weaknesses. If you would like any additional assistance with the calculation or analysis of your company's ratios, please contact the office.

Q. I have a professional services firm and am considering hiring my wife to help out with some of the administrative tasks in the office. I don't think we'll have a problem working together but I would like to have more information about the tax aspects of such an arrangement before I make the leap. What are some of the tax advantages of hiring my spouse?

Q. I have a professional services firm and am considering hiring my wife to help out with some of the administrative tasks in the office. I don't think we'll have a problem working together but I would like to have more information about the tax aspects of such an arrangement before I make the leap. What are some of the tax advantages of hiring my spouse?

A. Small business owners have long adhered to the practice of hiring family members to help them run their businesses -- results have ranged from very rewarding to absolutely disastrous. From a purely financial aspect, however, it is very important for you as a business owner to consider the tax advantages and potential pitfalls of hiring -- or continuing to employ -- family members in your small business.

Keeping it all in the family

Pay your family -- not Uncle Sam. Hiring family members can be a way of keeping more of your business income available for you and your family. The business gets a deduction for the wages paid -- as long as the family members are performing actual services in exchange for the compensation that they are receiving. This is true even though the family member will have to include the compensation received in income.

Some of the major tax advantages that often can be achieved through hiring a family member -- in this case, your spouse -- include:

Health insurance deduction. If you are self-employed and hire your spouse as a bona fide employee, your spouse -- as one of your employees -- can be given full health insurance coverage for all family members, including you as the business owner. This will convert the family health insurance premiums into a 100% deductible expense.

Company retirement plan participation. You may be able to deduct contributions made on behalf of your spouse to a company sponsored retirement plan if they are employees. The tax rules involved to put family members into your businesses retirement plan are quite complex, however, and generally require you to give equal treatment to all employees, whether or not related.

Travel expenses. If your spouse is an employee, you may be able to deduct the costs attributable to her or him accompanying you on business travel if both of you perform a legitimate business function while travelling.

IRA contributions. Paying your spouse a salary may enable them to make deductible IRA contributions based on the earned income that they receive, or Roth contributions that will accumulate tax-free for eventual tax-free distribution.

"Reasonable compensation"

In order for a business owner to realize any of the advantages connected with the hiring family members as discussed above, it is imperative for the family member to have engaged in bona fide work that merits the compensation being paid. Because this area has such a high potential for abuse, it's definitely a hot issue with the IRS. If compensation paid to a family member is deemed excessive, payments may be reclassified as gifts or as a means of equalizing payments to shareholders.

As you decide on how much to pay your spouse working in your business, keep in mind the reasonable compensation issue. Consider the going market rate for the work that is being done and pay accordingly. This conservative approach could save you money and headaches in the event of an audit by the IRS.

Hiring your spouse can be a rewarding and cost effective solution for your small business. However, in order to get the maximum benefit from such an arrangement, proper planning should be done. For additional guidance, please feel free to contact the office.

Stock options have become a common part of many compensation and benefits packages. Even small businesses have jumped on the bandwagon and now provide a perk previously confined to the executive suites of large publicly held companies. If you are an employee who has received stock options, you need to be aware of the complicated tax rules that govern certain stock options -- several potential "gotchas" exist and failing to spot them can cause major tax headaches.

Stock options have become a common part of many compensation and benefits packages. Even small businesses have jumped on the bandwagon and now provide a perk previously confined to the executive suites of large publicly held companies. If you are an employee who has received stock options, you need to be aware of the complicated tax rules that govern certain stock options -- several potential "gotchas" exist and failing to spot them can cause major tax headaches.

Over the past few years, the rules governing stock options have become increasingly complicated. More than ever, it is important that employees who receive stock options have a good understanding about how they are taxed -- on receipt of the option, at its exercise, or pursuant to the sale of the underlying stock -- as well as the potential consequences of their decisions regarding the timing of the taxation of those options.

NSOs vs ISOs

The most common type of stock option that employees receive is called a nonstatutory stock option (NSO). The other, less common type of stock option is generically referred to as an incentive stock option (ISO). ISOs are governed by very specific rules and are subjected to strict statutory requirements; NSOs, on the other hand, are subject to more general rules and guidelines.

Incentive stock options (ISOs) give the employee the right to purchase stock from the employer at a specified price. The employee is not taxed on the ISO at the time of its grant or at the time of the exercise of the option. Instead, he or she is taxed only at the time of the disposition of the stock acquired through exercise of the option. Note, however, the exercise of an ISO does give rise to an alternative minimum tax item in the amount of the difference between the option price and the market price of the stock.

Note. The IRS temporarily suspended the collection of ISO alternative minimum tax (AMT) liabilities through September 30, 2008.

NSOs also give the employee the right to purchase stock from the employer at a specified price. When and how an NSO is taxed depends on several factors including whether the underlying stock is substantially vested, and whether or not the fair market value of the stock is readily ascertainable.

Vesting. If an employee receives options from his employer, the tax consequences depend on whether the stock is vested. Stock you receive from your employer is "substantially vested" if it is either "transferable" by the employee or it is no longer subject to a "substantial risk of forfeiture". Property is "transferable" if you can sell, assign or pledge your interest in the option without the risk of losing it. A "substantial risk of forfeiture" exists if the rights in the property transferred depend on the future performance (or refraining from performance) of substantial services by any person, or the occurrence of a certain condition related to the transfer.

Readily ascertainable fair market value. An NSO always has a readily ascertainable fair market value when the option is publicly traded. When an option is not publicly traded, it can have a readily ascertainable fair market value if its value can be measured with reasonable accuracy. IRS rules spell out when fair market value can be measured with reasonable accuracy.

Generally, an employee who receives an NSO that has a readily ascertainable fair market value is subject to special tax rules under the Internal Revenue Code that apply to property received by a taxpayer in exchange for services when the option is granted. Under these rules, the option must be included in the employee's income as ordinary income in the amount of the fair market value in the year the option becomes substantially vested. If the employee paid for the option, he recognizes the value of the option minus its cost. The employee is not taxed again when he exercises the option and buys the corporate stock; he is taxed when the stock is sold. The gain or loss recognized when the employee sells the stock is capital in nature.

No readily ascertainable fair market value. Employees who receive NSOs from privately held companies are most likely to receive an NSO without a readily ascertainable fair market value. In general, when an NSO does not have a readily ascertainable fair market value, taxation occurs at the time when the option is exercised or transferred. The employee will recognize ordinary income in the amount of the value of the stock when it becomes substantially vested minus any amounts paid for the option or stock. The gain or loss recognized when the employee sells the stock is capital in nature. However, employees who have NSOs without a readily ascertainable fair market value also have the ability to elect to have the transaction taxed differently,

Section 83(b) election: Elector beware

Employees who exercise options that did not have a readily ascertainable fair market value when they were granted may elect to report income from the stock underlying the option at the time of the exercise rather than waiting until the stock is substantially vested. This election is referred to as a "Section 83(b) election" and is non-revocable. Once the election is made, any later subsequent appreciation when the stock becomes substantially vested would not be includible in income.

As you can see, the rules and tax laws related to stock options are indeed complicated and require some advance planning in order to avoid a big tax "gotcha". If you are contemplating entering into any transactions that involve stock options, please contact the office for additional guidance.

All of us will, at one time or another, incur financial losses - whether insubstantial or quite significant -- in our business and personal lives. When business fortunes head South -- either temporarily or in a more prolonged slide, it is important to be aware of how the tax law can limit the actual amount of your losses and your ability to deduct them. Here are some of the types of losses your business may experience and the related tax considerations to keep in mind in the event of a business downturn.

All of us will, at one time or another, incur financial losses - whether insubstantial or quite significant -- in our business and personal lives. When business fortunes head South -- either temporarily or in a more prolonged slide, it is important to be aware of how the tax law can limit the actual amount of your losses and your ability to deduct them. Here are some of the types of losses your business may experience and the related tax considerations to keep in mind in the event of a business downturn.

Bad debts

One loss that occurs frequently when business slows down is bad debt. A bad debt is simply a technical term used to describe a debt that has become totally or partially worthless. Different strategies apply depending upon whether you are the borrower or the lender.

As borrower. If you are the borrower, the "forgiveness" of all or part of the debt by the lender will generally trigger taxable income on that amount, unless the business is insolvent (debts exceed liabilities).

Note. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) allows some business to elect to recognize cancellation of indebtedness income over five years, beginning in 2014. The temporary benefit applies to specific types of business debt repurchased by the business after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2011. Under this provision, an applicable debt instrument includes a bond, note, certificate, debenture, or other instrument that constitutes indebtedness issued by a C corporation or any other "person" in connection with the conduct of trade or business by that person. This election is irrevocable. Moreover, the liquidation or sale of substantially all the taxpayer's assets can result in acceleration of deferred items.

Although recognizing income may not be an immediate problem for a business that has plenty of losses to net against current income, additional income may wash out a net operating loss carryover that can either provide an immediate refund for a past tax year or shelter from income in the future. As a result, some businesses re-define debt "forgiveness" into a non-taxable event, such as a refinancing or a business-generated settlement.

As lender. If you are the lender, your major tax concern will be proving that a real debt exists, and then determining how fast you can deduct the bad debt and whether the deduction can offset ordinary income, as opposed to just capital gains.

Loans between corporations and their shareholders are scrutinized to make sure that they are really debts rather than disguised dividends or contributions to the corporation's capital. You can protect yourself by taking the steps that an arm's-length lender would take, such as putting it in writing and charging a reasonable rate of interest.

The IRS sometimes requires taxpayers to play a guessing game about which tax year a debt becomes sufficiently worthless to support the deduction. Because of potential statute of limitations problems, tax experts generally recommend that you claim the loss in the earliest possible year that it can reasonably be argued to be worthless.

Finally, you must determine whether a business or nonbusiness bad debt exists. A business bad debt must be created or acquired, or become worthless, in the course of your trade or business. If you conduct a business in the form of a corporation, generally any debt held by the corporation is a business debt. Any debt not falling into the business category is a nonbusiness debt.

As guarantor. If you take out a loan on behalf of your corporation or you personally guarantee the loan and then must make good on it, you are usually considered to have either made a contribution to capital or created a nonbusiness bad debt to protect your position as an investor. A nonbusiness debt must be completely worthless before a loss can be taken. Furthermore, nonbusiness bad debts are subject to limits on capital losses. Business bad debts, on the other hand, are deductible as ordinary losses in full against your other income.

Net operating losses

If you show a net operating loss for the year, it normally may be carried back two years or carried forward up to 20 years until it can be netted against current taxable income. A net operating loss (NOL) for this purpose has some complexity built in to strip it of most personal tax characteristics. An individual's NOL, for example, does not include any offset for personal or dependency exemptions, for net nonbusiness capital losses, or for nonbusiness itemized deductions that exceed nonbusiness income. Another choice in dealing with an NOL is to elect to immediately carryforward the loss. This can be advantageous when high rate-bracket income is anticipated in the following year.

Note. The 2009 Recovery Act provides a five-year carryback of 2008 NOLs for qualified small businesses only. These are small businesses with average gross receipts of $15 million or less. Businesses can choose to carryback NOLs three, four or five years. This treatment applies only to NOLs for any tax year beginning or ending in 2008. The normal NOL carryback period returns in for NOLs incurred in 2009.

Pass-through losses

One of the advantages of investing in a business as a partner or a subchapter S shareholder is that losses on the business level get passed-through to your individual tax return. Regular corporations, on the other hand, file separate returns and the shareholder cannot "realize" a tax loss until he or she actually sells stock.

For both partners and S shareholders, however, the ability to deduct pass-through losses is determined by the amount of tax basis the partner has in his partnership interest or the S shareholder has in his shares. This, in turn, depends upon a variety of factors, including the original price paid, the amount of losses already passed through, cash or property distributed, and any later contributions.

If you have such a stake in a business, a tax strategy for both adding to basis and preventing its diminution is critical to your ability to be able to deduct business losses as a partner or S shareholder.

Section 1244 Stock

If you sell stock at a loss and that stock had been designated on its issuance to be "Section 1244 stock," you are more fortunate than most investors who bail out during a business downturn. Reason: you are entitled to an ordinary loss deduction rather than a capital loss. This special loss treatment is limited to $50,000 for any one year ($100,000 for joint returns). Other requirements are that the stock was issued for no more than $1 million, less than 50% of corporate receipts were from passive sources for the first five years of operation, and the shareholder claiming the treatment must be an individual.

Dealing with and making the most of losses related to a business downturn can get complicated. Because the preceding discussion is meant to be general, is limited in nature and does not cover all the tax rules involved, you are encourage to contact the office for additional guidance with this issue.